Alarm Check Method real-life diffrence?

SyRenity · Post by **SyRenity** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:08 pm

Hi.

After playing with the zones a bit, I wonder if someone ever used other alarm check method then "blobs", and have found it more accurate or faster?

Lee Sharp · Post by **Lee Sharp** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:26 pm

Yes. It uses less CPU but it doesn't give you the nice red outline to troubleshoot false positives.

SyRenity · Post by **SyRenity** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:34 pm

Thanks for the info.

And what about the accuracy? Is it accurate in the same way as the blobs method?

Lee Sharp · Post by **Lee Sharp** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:08 pm

I have not noticed a difference, but I have not looked that closely.

jameswilson · Post by **jameswilson** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:23 pm

from memory the othe rmethods are the old methods ie filtered and alarmed and are not as good, filtered might be ok but blobs has additional processing plus the prettyness mentioned
sy, if you wanana make you r box public and let me in ill have a look if you like. Ive laways used blobs