Veo Observer IP NetCam

Post here to indicate any hardware you have used and which is known to work with ZoneMinder. Not for questions.
User avatar
MJN
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Wiltshire, UK

Post by MJN »

You sound quite into this camera but how would you rate the images compared to other cameras? I thought the samples above lacked sharpness and the colour definition seemed quite off. Or were the shots taken in quite low (and incandescent) light?

Mathew
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

MJN wrote:You sound quite into this camera but how would you rate the images compared to other cameras? I thought the samples above lacked sharpness and the colour definition seemed quite off. Or were the shots taken in quite low (and incandescent) light?

Mathew
The pictures I posted earlier were in low-light indeed...

The old Axis 2100 I had before had a little better image, however on 320x240 it was able to give max 10fps in full light! Plus, it featured some really stupid mechanism of improving low-light frames in detriment of the fps, so I kept having slipping/wowing fps recordings when light turned on and off... Wasn't able to turn this 'feature' off.

This model of course is not a top-quality one, however the price I paid for it (~42$ for a used one) can't be beat, because it features:
- more than 30fps at 352x288
- standard lens compatible
- officially supporting Jpeg frame query and Mjpeg stream push
- full documentation and no need to hack anything
- smaller size than the average IP cameras
- real-time audio over the IP connection (not interesting from today's ZM point of view, but could be useful)

I also had an Edimax IC1500 but that costed 3 times much, no standard lens, no way of extracting Mjpeg/Jpeg in a straight way... I had to sell it and I was happy I was able to!

I don't say it has the best picture quality, but I know there are many people out there like me who can't afford hundreds of $$ to spend on pro IP cameras, to secure their homes, not making bussiness out of it... Life is always a compromise, so this camera - a good compromise, imho. Afaik this model has ran out, anyway, so one can get it only in used condition.

Image
v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

I found a live image of a similar camera, basically this is it:
Image
v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
User avatar
MJN
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Wiltshire, UK

Post by MJN »

Sure, I do appreciate that 'bang for the buck' is very relevant.

It is small too isn't it? Either that or an oversized box of matches! ;)

Thanks again for all the info - it's a useful level of detail for potential buyers.

Mathew
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

Well I think all this info may be useful not only for owners of this model, but for other IP digitizers/cameras that come with the same Winbond chip.
v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

Sweex IP Network Camera JA200010, is another clone of this camera.
Image
v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

I've been using one of these for a few weeks now, and I discovered that the mjpeg stream peaks only at 20-25 fps, while jpg stills grabbed peak at more than 30 fps.

It looks like it's better to use the jpg stills instead of the mjpeg feed.
v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
razza
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:13 pm
Location: UK

Post by razza »

Is this a sensible camera for a newbie to learn with?
Thanks in advance! :D
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

razza wrote:Is this a sensible camera for a newbie to learn with?
Thanks in advance! :D
How do you mean 'sensible'?
v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
razza
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:13 pm
Location: UK

Post by razza »

robi wrote:How do you mean 'sensible'?
One that is going to not give me endless problems, as I need/want to focus on zoneminder itself.
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

razza wrote:
robi wrote:How do you mean 'sensible'?
One that is going to not give me endless problems, as I need/want to focus on zoneminder itself.
Just plug it in 8) It should work straight away, if you set it up like described.
v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
kububa
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:45 pm

Planet ICA-500 / Planet ICA-300

Post by kububa »

IP Cameras:
Planet ICA-500
Planet ICA-300 works similar as:

http://www.zoneminder.com/wiki/index.ph ... _IP_NetCam

The URL of the JPEG image is
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/Jpeg/CamImg.jpg

It took me two years of researching and I was waiting for ZoneMinder 1.24, while my IP cameras are mjpeg not mpeg4...
Finally I found this topic on the forum... Thanks guys!!!
User avatar
robi
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:48 am

Post by robi »

Image
v1.25.0 + Ubuntu Linux 12.04 Server
WalterArcher
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:08 am

Post by WalterArcher »

The camera will make any folder you create in motion detection settings page on the ftp server.The result of the camera is also very fantastic.
Post Reply